🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he does so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.